osewalrus (osewalrus) wrote,
osewalrus
osewalrus

Worsht . . . . Econ Paper . . . . EVAR!

http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2012/db0605/DOC-314439A1.pdf

Srsly, how many counter-factual mathematical tractibility assumptions are you allowed to make before we conclude you are making this shit up.

I thought Bykowsky & Sharkey could not possibly top this paper on licensed v. unlicensed as the epitome of awfulness. But this is worse. It's like the Eye of Argon, but with math!

I have a jr lawyer with a BA in math who came to me to explain that she could not understand how Bykowsky and Sharkey got their numbers. To which I replied: you are right. That is because, despite making numerous tractibility assumptions and imposing artificial limitations to make a solution possible -- they still have to make shit up.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 5 comments