?

Log in

No account? Create an account
I surrender
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends View]

Tuesday, February 19th, 2013

Time Event
6:11a
We have a brand new bed
On Sunday, we got a new tempur-pedic adjustable bed. It arrived last night. After clearing away a veritable ecology of dust bunnies, cat toys, and lost shoes under the bed, the nice people from Mattress Discounters set it up.

Conclusion after the first night is that it was, indeed, worth the outrageous cost -- especially as it comes with a 20 year guarantee. This is good, as we are very hard on our beds (a statement more about our weight than about anything salacious). My shoulder is definitely feeling better on waking than it has for nearly 6 weeks, and Becky reports that it was extremely helpful for her back and knees. It was very useful to have the head and toes elevated. So yes, this bed was good for (all of you with small children join in):

Head, shoulders, knees and toes (knees and toes)
Head, shoulder knees and toes.
4:31p
National and individual evolution as complementary ideas in Jewish theology
I have wanted to write up a particular insight I had on Mishpatim when we were reading that and simply have not had time. It is an effort to address the following question:

The Bible contains laws wrt institutions we now find offensive, such as slavery. A traditional answer given is that these laws are designed to moderate what were then prevalent customs and gradually wean people away from their practice. For example, the Bible permits the institution of slavery -- including the betrothal of one's daughter through a form of sale. Under this approach, the justification for including such an obvious moral wrong in the Bible is that it was necessary to moderate an already existing practice.

The difficulty with this approach is that the Bible contains some outright prohibitions on other behaviors. What, therefore, creates a situation in which God chooses simply to moderate behavior in the hopes that human beings will eventually give it up entirely, whereas other behaviors are banned entirely? Can we identify certain classes of behavior as creating a pattern? And -- if God disapproves of specific behaviors -- why not ban them entirely? Alternatively, how do we explain the alternative, when Rabbinic decree allows individuals to circumvent a direct Biblical ban (e.g., the creation of "prosbul" to allow debt to survive the Sabbatical Year)?

I have developed a marvelous proof. Unfortunately, I don't have time to fully outline it. This is frustrating. But hopefully I will have time to write it out more in the future.
9:33p
I hate it when that happens
Ever have a conversation with someone you basically like, and then they start saying something utterly bizarre? And the more you talk in the hopes you will discover you misunderstood them, the actually more divorced from reality it gets?

<< Previous Day 2013/02/19
[Calendar]
Next Day >>
Tales of the Sausage Factory   About LiveJournal.com