?

Log in

No account? Create an account
I surrender
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends View]

Tuesday, June 11th, 2013

Time Event
1:41p
Real Life Ethics Problems
Both Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden present us with a real life ethics question. At what point does the oath to uphold the constitution of the United States and our general duty to speak out against the abuse of power trump our other duties and loyalties? This is not a question easily answered.

Nor, even when answered, does it resolve the question of whether their conduct should be punished.  We may well decide that they acted morally, but that the need to maintain discipline within these organizations requires that these infractions be severely punished.

If you marvel at the injustice of this, consider: the world is more complicated than a simple set of absolute principles. If this makes you uncomfortable -- good. Philosophy and ethics should not be the quest for good feeling, or for a 'safe harbor' that will somehow leave us blameless. In my opinion, one of the unfortunate errors to which society is heir is the belief that our religion or our ethics is about how to feel 'good' or 'fulfilled.' 
2:16p
So why should birth control pills be prescription only?
I am seriously having trouble understanding why we require prescription for birth control pills if we are going to have Plan B, which is basically a high-dose birth control pill, available without prescription. Is the assumption that people are not going to figure out that these are the same pill but different dosages? Is the assumption that the cost of Plan B is sufficiently high to discourage use as anything but a morning after pill?

Plan B is safe if taken as directed -- as an emergency contraception on an occasional basis. Since birth control pills are cheap and available for women over 18, despite needing a prescription, we have not worried that women will substitute Plan B for birth control pills because there is no need to do so and because we anticipate they will understand the warning label wrt potential consequences if they use Plan B as a substitute for regular birth control pills.

This is demonstrably not true for pre-teens and young teens. The entire point of waiving the prescription requirement is that the need to get a prescription is a barrier to getting the medication. Since birth control pills require a prescription, we can assume that there are young women who would use regular birth control pills, but do not because of the prescription requirement. Why do we assume that they will not therefore use OTC Plan B as a birth control pill?

The rational thing is therefore to make regular birth control pills equally accessible. This will prevent what could otherwise be a dangerous substitution.

<< Previous Day 2013/06/11
[Calendar]
Next Day >>
Tales of the Sausage Factory   About LiveJournal.com